Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 56 of
56
with 100 items per page.
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen abstract "AT&T Corporation v. Hulteen, 556 U.S. 701 (2009), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that maternity leave taken before the passage of the 1978 Pregnancy Discrimination Act cannot be considered in calculating employee pension benefits.".
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen wikiPageExternalLink 07-543.
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen wikiPageExternalLink att-corp-v-hulteen.
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen wikiPageExternalLink 07-543.pdf.
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen wikiPageID "22856791".
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen wikiPageRevisionID "561753211".
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen arguedate "--12-10".
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen argueyear "2008".
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen concurrence "Stevens".
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen decidedate "--05-18".
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen decideyear "2009".
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen dissent "Ginsburg".
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen docket "7".
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen fullname "AT&T Corporation, Petitioner v. Noreen Hulteen, et al.".
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen hasPhotoCollection AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen.
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen holding "Maternity leave taken before the passage of the 1978 Pregnancy Discrimination Act cannot be considered in calculating employee pension benefits.".
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen joindissent "Breyer".
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen joinmajority "Roberts, Stevens, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito".
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen litigants "AT&T Corporation v. Hulteen".
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen majority "Souter".
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen prior "25920.0".
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen scotus "2006".
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen uspage "701".
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen usvol "556".
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen subject Category:2009_in_United_States_case_law.
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen subject Category:AT&T_litigation.
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen subject Category:Communications_Workers_of_America.
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen subject Category:Family_law_in_the_United_States.
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen subject Category:Parental_leave.
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen subject Category:United_States_labor_case_law.
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen type CausalAgent100007347.
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen type CommunicationsWorkersOfAmerica.
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen type LivingThing100004258.
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen type Object100002684.
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen type Organism100004475.
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen type Person100007846.
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen type PhysicalEntity100001930.
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen type Whole100003553.
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen type Worker109632518.
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen type YagoLegalActor.
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen type YagoLegalActorGeo.
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen type Case.
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen type LegalCase.
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen type UnitOfWork.
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen type Situation.
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen comment "AT&T Corporation v. Hulteen, 556 U.S. 701 (2009), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that maternity leave taken before the passage of the 1978 Pregnancy Discrimination Act cannot be considered in calculating employee pension benefits.".
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen label "AT&T Corporation v. Hulteen".
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen sameAs m.063z3nj.
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen sameAs Q4654526.
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen sameAs Q4654526.
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen sameAs AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen.
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen wasDerivedFrom AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen?oldid=561753211.
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen isPrimaryTopicOf AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen.
- AT&T_Corporation_v._Hulteen name "AT&T Corporation, Petitioner v. Noreen Hulteen, et al.".