Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Ho_v._Taflove> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 22 of
22
with 100 items per page.
- Ho_v._Taflove abstract "Ho v. Taflove was a ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in 2011 that affirmed a 2009 decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois: the expression of ideas can be copyrighted but not the ideas themselves (the idea-expression divide).The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants violated the copyright law of the United States by publishing equations, figures, and text from research materials that the plaintiffs had produced. They also alleged that Illinois state laws were violated by publication of the materials. The district court granted summary judgment against the plaintiffs. The appeals court confirmed the judgment, concluding that the research materials were unprotectable ideas under the merger doctrine of copyright law, and that the claims of state law violations had no merit and were superseded by the Copyright Act.".
- Ho_v._Taflove wikiPageExternalLink 10-2144-2011-06-06-opinion-2011-06-06.pdf?1307383272.
- Ho_v._Taflove wikiPageID "33449358".
- Ho_v._Taflove wikiPageRevisionID "500656057".
- Ho_v._Taflove citations "--06-06".
- Ho_v._Taflove court United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Seventh_Circuit.
- Ho_v._Taflove dateDecided "2011-06-06".
- Ho_v._Taflove fullName "Seng-Tiong Ho, et al. v. Allen Taflove, et al.".
- Ho_v._Taflove hasPhotoCollection Ho_v._Taflove.
- Ho_v._Taflove judges "Kenneth F. Ripple and David F. Hamilton, Circuit Judges, and G. Patrick Murphy, District Judge".
- Ho_v._Taflove name "Ho v. Taflove".
- Ho_v._Taflove opinions "The plaintiff's research materials were unprotectable ideas under copyright law's merger doctrine. Summary judgment in favor of the defendants.".
- Ho_v._Taflove subject Category:2011_in_United_States_case_law.
- Ho_v._Taflove subject Category:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Seventh_Circuit_cases.
- Ho_v._Taflove subject Category:United_States_copyright_case_law.
- Ho_v._Taflove comment "Ho v. Taflove was a ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in 2011 that affirmed a 2009 decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois: the expression of ideas can be copyrighted but not the ideas themselves (the idea-expression divide).The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants violated the copyright law of the United States by publishing equations, figures, and text from research materials that the plaintiffs had produced.".
- Ho_v._Taflove label "Ho v. Taflove".
- Ho_v._Taflove sameAs m.0h95bt2.
- Ho_v._Taflove sameAs Q5874219.
- Ho_v._Taflove sameAs Q5874219.
- Ho_v._Taflove wasDerivedFrom Ho_v._Taflove?oldid=500656057.
- Ho_v._Taflove isPrimaryTopicOf Ho_v._Taflove.