Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 45 of
45
with 100 items per page.
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt abstract "David Irving v Penguin Books and Deborah Lipstadt is a case in English law, relating to defamation and Holocaust denial. It ruled that the claim that such denial is a deliberate distortion of evidence is substantially true, and therefore not libellous.In 1996, the British author David Irving filed suit against American author Deborah Lipstadt and her publisher Penguin Books in an English court, claiming that Lipstadt had libeled him in her book Denying the Holocaust. Lipstadt had accused him of deliberately misrepresenting evidence to conform to his ideological viewpoint. English libel law puts the burden of proof on the defence, meaning that it was up to Lipstadt and her publisher to prove that her claims were substantially true.Lipstadt hired British lawyer Anthony Julius while Penguin hired libel experts Kevin Bays and Mark Bateman of media law firm Davenport Lyons. Cambridge historian Richard J. Evans was hired by the defence to serve as an expert witness. Evans spent two years examining Irving's work, and presented evidence of Irving's misrepresentations, including evidence that Irving had knowingly used forged documents as source material. Upon mutual agreement, the case was argued as a bench trial before Mr. Justice Charles Gray, who produced a written judgment 333 pages long in favour of the defendants, in which he detailed Irving's systematic distortion of the historical record of World War II.".
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt thumbnail David_irving.jpg?width=300.
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt wikiPageExternalLink index.html.
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt wikiPageExternalLink 115.html.
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt wikiPageExternalLink irving.
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt wikiPageExternalLink transcripts.
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt wikiPageExternalLink trial.
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt wikiPageExternalLink closing_address.rampton.shtml.
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt wikiPageExternalLink holocaust.
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt wikiPageExternalLink www.ushmm.org.
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt wikiPageExternalLink index.php?content=20070315.
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt wikiPageID "23235716".
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt wikiPageRevisionID "606289047".
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt citations 115.html.
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt court High_Court_of_Justice.
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt dateDecided "2000-04-11".
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt fullName "Irving v Penguin Books Limited, Deborah E. Lipstadt".
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt hasPhotoCollection Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt.
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt judges Charles_Gray_(judge).
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt name "Irving v Penguin and Lipstadt".
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt opinions "... the evidence supports the following propositions: that the shooting of the Jews in the East was systematic and directed from Berlin with the knowledge and approval of Hitler; that there were gas chambers at several of the Operation Reinhard camps and that hundreds of thousands of Jews were killed in them and that there were gas chambers at Auschwitz, where hundreds of thousands more Jews were gassed to death. It follows that it is my conclusion that Irving's denials of these propositions were contrary to the evidence. ... Irving has for his own ideological reasons persistently and deliberately misrepresented and manipulated historical evidence. ... therefore the defence of justification succeeds.".
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt subsequentActions "Application for appeal denied".
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt transcripts transcripts.
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt subject Category:2000_in_England.
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt subject Category:2000_in_case_law.
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt subject Category:2000_in_the_United_Kingdom.
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt subject Category:Antisemitism_in_England.
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt subject Category:David_Irving.
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt subject Category:English_defamation_case_law.
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt subject Category:High_Court_of_Justice_cases.
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt subject Category:Holocaust_denial_in_the_United_Kingdom.
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt subject Category:Holocaust_studies.
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt subject Category:Penguin_Books.
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt subject Category:Pseudohistory.
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt comment "David Irving v Penguin Books and Deborah Lipstadt is a case in English law, relating to defamation and Holocaust denial. It ruled that the claim that such denial is a deliberate distortion of evidence is substantially true, and therefore not libellous.In 1996, the British author David Irving filed suit against American author Deborah Lipstadt and her publisher Penguin Books in an English court, claiming that Lipstadt had libeled him in her book Denying the Holocaust.".
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt label "Irving contra Lipstadt y otros".
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt label "Irving v Penguin Books and Lipstadt".
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt label "Процесс Ирвинг против Липштадт".
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt sameAs Irving_contra_Lipstadt_y_otros.
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt sameAs m.06w1g6g.
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt sameAs Q4382268.
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt sameAs Q4382268.
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt wasDerivedFrom Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt?oldid=606289047.
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt depiction David_irving.jpg.
- Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt isPrimaryTopicOf Irving_v_Penguin_Books_and_Lipstadt.