Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/SEC_v._Rajaratnam> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 48 of
48
with 100 items per page.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam abstract "SEC v. Rajaratnam, No. 622 F.3d 159 (2d Cir. 2010), is a United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit case in which defendants Raj Rajaratnam and Danielle Chiesi appealed a discovery order issued by a district court during a civil trial against them for insider trading filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The district court compelled the defendants to disclose to the SEC the contents of thousands of wiretapped conversations that were originally obtained by the United States Attorney's Office (USAO) and were turned over to the defendants during a separate criminal trial.The Second Circuit court held that although it is lawful to order such a disclosure, and the SEC indeed had a right to access the conversations in preparation for the civil trial, the district court exceeded its discretion by failing to limit the disclosure to conversations relevant to the current case. Citing the significant privacy implications of such a disclosure, the Second Circuit court granted a writ to vacate the discovery order, and remanded the case back to the district court.".
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam thumbnail US-CourtOfAppeals-2ndCircuit-Seal.png?width=300.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam wikiPageExternalLink scholar_case?&hl=en&as_sdt=2,5&as_vis=1&case=5730664764872591612&scilh=0.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam wikiPageExternalLink 2510.html.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam wikiPageExternalLink xmlResult.aspx?xmldoc=in%20fco%2020100929000t.xml&docbase=cslwar3-2007-curr.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam wikiPageExternalLink Judge-Rakoff-Order-in-Galleon-Case.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam wikiPageExternalLink comp21255.pdf.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam wikiPageID "34570046".
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam wikiPageRevisionID "605589333".
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam citations "25920.0".
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam court United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Second_Circuit.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam dateDecided "2010-09-29".
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam fullName "Securities and Exchange Commission v. Raj Rajaratnam, Danielle Chiesi, Galleon Management, LP, Ali Hariri, Ali T. Far, Anil Kumar, Choo-Beng Lee, David Plate, Deep Shah, Far & Lee LLC, Gautham Shankar, Mark Kurland, New Castle Funds LLC, Rajiv Goel, Robert Moffat, Roomy Khan, S2 Capital Management, LP, Schottenfeld Group LLC, Spherix Capital LLC, Steven Fortuna, Zvi Goffer".
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam hasPhotoCollection SEC_v._Rajaratnam.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam judges "Raggi, Lynch, and Chin, Circuit Judges".
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam name "SEC v. Rajaratnam".
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam opinions "The court held that while an order to compel the disclosure of wiretap communications is lawful, the district court exceeded its discretion in the current case because it failed to determine the legality of the wiretaps before issuing the order, and did not limit the disclosure to only relevant conversations.".
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam subject Category:2010_in_United_States_case_law.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam subject Category:Financial_scandals.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam subject Category:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Second_Circuit_cases.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam subject Category:United_States_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission_litigation.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam subject Category:United_States_criminal_discovery_case_law.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam type Abstraction100002137.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam type Act100030358.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam type Assembly108163792.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam type Court108329453.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam type Event100029378.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam type FinancialScandals.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam type Gathering107975026.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam type Gossip107223170.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam type Group100031264.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam type Informing107212190.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam type PsychologicalFeature100023100.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam type Report107217924.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam type Scandal107223811.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam type SocialGroup107950920.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam type SpeechAct107160883.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam type UnitedStatesCourtsOfAppealsCases.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam type YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam comment "SEC v. Rajaratnam, No. 622 F.3d 159 (2d Cir. 2010), is a United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit case in which defendants Raj Rajaratnam and Danielle Chiesi appealed a discovery order issued by a district court during a civil trial against them for insider trading filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).".
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam label "SEC v. Rajaratnam".
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam sameAs m.0j43s33.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam sameAs Q7389635.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam sameAs Q7389635.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam sameAs SEC_v._Rajaratnam.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam wasDerivedFrom SEC_v._Rajaratnam?oldid=605589333.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam depiction US-CourtOfAppeals-2ndCircuit-Seal.png.
- SEC_v._Rajaratnam isPrimaryTopicOf SEC_v._Rajaratnam.