Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Twitter_Joke_Trial> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 38 of
38
with 100 items per page.
- Twitter_Joke_Trial abstract "The case of R v Paul Chambers (appealed to the High Court as Chambers v Director of Public Prosecutions), better known as the Twitter Joke Trial, is a United Kingdom legal case centred on an incident in which Paul Chambers was convicted of using Twitter to send a "public electronic message that was grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character contrary to the Communications Act 2003". The conviction was widely condemned as unfair, and referred to as a miscarriage of justice; and was appealed three times. After the first two appeals failed, the judgement in the third appeal, in London's High Court, was in Chambers' favour, resulting in the quashing of his conviction.".
- Twitter_Joke_Trial wikiPageExternalLink 2157.html.
- Twitter_Joke_Trial wikiPageExternalLink incoming-396555.
- Twitter_Joke_Trial wikiPageID "30047593".
- Twitter_Joke_Trial wikiPageRevisionID "587325070".
- Twitter_Joke_Trial appealedFrom "Doncaster magistrates court".
- Twitter_Joke_Trial citations 2157.html.
- Twitter_Joke_Trial court High_Court_of_Justice.
- Twitter_Joke_Trial dateDecided "2012-07-27".
- Twitter_Joke_Trial fullName "Paul Chambers v Director of Public Prosecutions".
- Twitter_Joke_Trial hasPhotoCollection Twitter_Joke_Trial.
- Twitter_Joke_Trial italicTitle "no".
- Twitter_Joke_Trial judges Igor_Judge,_Baron_Judge.
- Twitter_Joke_Trial judges "Mr Justice Griffith Williams".
- Twitter_Joke_Trial judges "Mr Justice Owen".
- Twitter_Joke_Trial keywords "* Communications Act 2003 * Freedom of speech * Menacing character * Mens rea * Twitter".
- Twitter_Joke_Trial name "Chambers v Director of Public Prosecutions".
- Twitter_Joke_Trial numberOfJudges "3".
- Twitter_Joke_Trial opinions "The message was not objectively menacing; the conviction was therefore quashed.".
- Twitter_Joke_Trial transcripts 2157.html.
- Twitter_Joke_Trial subject Category:2010_in_England.
- Twitter_Joke_Trial subject Category:2011_in_England.
- Twitter_Joke_Trial subject Category:2011_in_law.
- Twitter_Joke_Trial subject Category:2012_in_England.
- Twitter_Joke_Trial subject Category:2012_in_law.
- Twitter_Joke_Trial subject Category:2012_in_the_United_Kingdom.
- Twitter_Joke_Trial subject Category:High_Court_of_Justice_cases.
- Twitter_Joke_Trial subject Category:Overturned_convictions_in_England.
- Twitter_Joke_Trial subject Category:Stephen_Fry.
- Twitter_Joke_Trial subject Category:Twitter_controversies.
- Twitter_Joke_Trial subject Category:United_Kingdom_free_speech_case_law.
- Twitter_Joke_Trial comment "The case of R v Paul Chambers (appealed to the High Court as Chambers v Director of Public Prosecutions), better known as the Twitter Joke Trial, is a United Kingdom legal case centred on an incident in which Paul Chambers was convicted of using Twitter to send a "public electronic message that was grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character contrary to the Communications Act 2003".".
- Twitter_Joke_Trial label "Twitter Joke Trial".
- Twitter_Joke_Trial sameAs m.0g54hbt.
- Twitter_Joke_Trial sameAs Q7858626.
- Twitter_Joke_Trial sameAs Q7858626.
- Twitter_Joke_Trial wasDerivedFrom Twitter_Joke_Trial?oldid=587325070.
- Twitter_Joke_Trial isPrimaryTopicOf Twitter_Joke_Trial.