Matches in ESWC 2020 for { <https://metadata.2020.eswc-conferences.org/rdf/submissions/Paper.251_Review.0> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 10 of
10
with 100 items per page.
- Paper.251_Review.0 type ReviewVersion.
- Paper.251_Review.0 issued "2001-01-13T13:41:00.000Z".
- Paper.251_Review.0 creator Paper.251_Review.0_Reviewer.
- Paper.251_Review.0 hasRating ReviewRating.2.
- Paper.251_Review.0 hasReviewerConfidence ReviewerConfidence.2.
- Paper.251_Review.0 reviews Paper.251.
- Paper.251_Review.0 issuedAt easychair.org.
- Paper.251_Review.0 issuedFor Conference.
- Paper.251_Review.0 releasedBy Conference.
- Paper.251_Review.0 hasContent "A solid paper targeting a typical research situation. The description of the state of the art is complete and well written. The idea of exploiting knowledge to improve shilling attacks is original. The description of the concept and the work done is comprehensible and coherent. With some missing articles, there is a slight sloppiness in the English writing. This makes a solid experiment with a solid outcome. This is the reason for accepting the paper. What I'm missing though is what that actually means. Are the differences of using the attacks big enough to make a difference e.g. in Social media and political campaigns? What would be defensive strategies in RS using the knowledge based approach? Is there any relation between how intelligent the CF-RS is and how much this affects the change from ShA to SAShA? Knowing a system and knowing the similarity to the target items, couldn't the system avoid the random items and only concentrate only on similar items without revealing the target item? It is one thing to target the improvement of state of the art attacks, but with this background, it may be worthwhile to explore new attacks based on semantic knowledge. In this case, the challenge is discoverability."".